Comments on: A positive test for Manny is worse for the Red Sox than the Dodgers http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=840 Go Big or Go Home Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:40:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: redsoxrule http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=840#comment-1970 redsoxrule Sat, 09 May 2009 17:41:34 +0000 http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=840#comment-1970 I disagree, and it's not because I'm a Red Sox fan. If he had've tested positive when he was with the Boston Red Sox when they won their two championships, then I'd agree 100%, but he didn't test positive as a member of the Sox, therefore there's no conclusive evidence that he was on the juice in Boston and therefore you have nothing but speculation to go on. He tested positive as a Dodger. It hurts the Dodgers more because their biggest bat is out for 50 games and their run through the playoffs last year definitely has black eye over it because Manny was the best player on that team, at least offensively. Could he have been on steroids in Boston? There's a good chance, but there's no proof of that yet so you can't conclude that his testing positive in 2009 as a member of the Dodgers damages the Red Sox of 2004 and 2007. I disagree, and it’s not because I’m a Red Sox fan. If he had’ve tested positive when he was with the Boston Red Sox when they won their two championships, then I’d agree 100%, but he didn’t test positive as a member of the Sox, therefore there’s no conclusive evidence that he was on the juice in Boston and therefore you have nothing but speculation to go on. He tested positive as a Dodger. It hurts the Dodgers more because their biggest bat is out for 50 games and their run through the playoffs last year definitely has black eye over it because Manny was the best player on that team, at least offensively.

Could he have been on steroids in Boston? There’s a good chance, but there’s no proof of that yet so you can’t conclude that his testing positive in 2009 as a member of the Dodgers damages the Red Sox of 2004 and 2007.

]]>