<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TSC NHL Playoff Preview - Western Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesportscorner.ca/?feed=rss2&#038;p=785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=785</link>
	<description>Go Big or Go Home</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mat T.</title>
		<link>http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=785#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=785#comment-1869</guid>
		<description>My predictions:

CGY in 6.  Even with Olli "the Cancer" Jokinen, I still think the Flames can steal the series in 6/7 from an inexperienced playoff team like Chicago.  Not having home ice might be the determining factor though, Flames are a totally different team on the road.  Either way, CGY's game plan will be to hit and wear out the smaller Kane, Toews, and the injury prone Havlat.  Chicago's defense is promising, but they haven't been in the playoffs before where they'll be hit on every play they make.

ANA in 7.  I'm going to go against the grain here and say an ANA upset in 7...maybe even 6 for that home ice win.  Niedermayer, Pronger, and Selanne on your team in the playoffs gives a team that extra push, and Beauchemin just returned too...he'll help log some big minutes.

Vancouver in 5.  Boyes, Tkachuk, McDonald, Berglund, Oshie, Backes, and Kariya (maybe) all sound scary.  But their defense is almost unheard of (McKee/Colaiacovo anyone?)..all the while the Canucks have Luongo, and that's even scarier.  Let's finally see what Sundin is made of.

Wings in 4.  Don't fuck with the Wings.  The overrated Steve Mason (yeah...I said it) will crumble in the playoffs...while Osgood will show you why the Wings stuck with him all along.  Nash will be the only reason CLS can win a game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My predictions:</p>
<p>CGY in 6.  Even with Olli &#8220;the Cancer&#8221; Jokinen, I still think the Flames can steal the series in 6/7 from an inexperienced playoff team like Chicago.  Not having home ice might be the determining factor though, Flames are a totally different team on the road.  Either way, CGY&#8217;s game plan will be to hit and wear out the smaller Kane, Toews, and the injury prone Havlat.  Chicago&#8217;s defense is promising, but they haven&#8217;t been in the playoffs before where they&#8217;ll be hit on every play they make.</p>
<p>ANA in 7.  I&#8217;m going to go against the grain here and say an ANA upset in 7&#8230;maybe even 6 for that home ice win.  Niedermayer, Pronger, and Selanne on your team in the playoffs gives a team that extra push, and Beauchemin just returned too&#8230;he&#8217;ll help log some big minutes.</p>
<p>Vancouver in 5.  Boyes, Tkachuk, McDonald, Berglund, Oshie, Backes, and Kariya (maybe) all sound scary.  But their defense is almost unheard of (McKee/Colaiacovo anyone?)..all the while the Canucks have Luongo, and that&#8217;s even scarier.  Let&#8217;s finally see what Sundin is made of.</p>
<p>Wings in 4.  Don&#8217;t fuck with the Wings.  The overrated Steve Mason (yeah&#8230;I said it) will crumble in the playoffs&#8230;while Osgood will show you why the Wings stuck with him all along.  Nash will be the only reason CLS can win a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hosea C</title>
		<link>http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=785#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>Hosea C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=785#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>Well, we're not going to be different just for the sake of being different. But you might be right, maybe the West is more boring/predictable then the East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we&#8217;re not going to be different just for the sake of being different. But you might be right, maybe the West is more boring/predictable then the East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: habsfan</title>
		<link>http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=785#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>habsfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=785#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>you guys picked the same team in every round?  is the western conference that boring?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys picked the same team in every round?  is the western conference that boring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinkedOnSports.com&#124; Rinkotology, Western Preview, Odds for the Playoffs</title>
		<link>http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=785#comment-1866</link>
		<dc:creator>LinkedOnSports.com&#124; Rinkotology, Western Preview, Odds for the Playoffs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportscorner.ca/?p=785#comment-1866</guid>
		<description>[...] -Western Conference playoff preview. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] -Western Conference playoff preview. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
